Technical Papers

Design Considerations of a Two—Pressure Humidity Generator

Author: Bob Hardy, RH Systems, Albuquerque, NM, USA

The two-pressure humidity generation technique is a well-known, highly documented method used for precise control of humidity values. This straight-forward method is in practice world-wide in a large number of standards and calibration laboratories, and is most common in the generation of %RH in the range of 10% to 98%, and for realization of the dew point temperature. While there are systems commercially available, it is commonplace in National Metrology Institutes (NMI) to design and construct the system locally with a goal to build a generator better than those used by their foreign colleagues. Generators that are designed, constructed, and offered commercially are also commonly used in NMIs and other calibration laboratories. While the humidity generating technique remains the same, it is often size, cost, and user-interface that distinguish commercially produced systems from their locally constructed cousins. Regardless of whether a system is commercially available or locally constructed, some areas of two-pressure generator design warrant consideration. Some common problems and potential solutions will be discussed.

Trust But Verify—Practical Approaches to Humidity Generation and Measurement

Author: Bob Hardy, RH Systems, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Construction of humidity generators is a common undertaking in many of today’s national metrology institutes and commercial calibration laboratories. A generator based on theoretical methods and statistical uncertainty expectations is often trusted as a laboratories primary humidity reference. While it is important to follow sound design theory, and compute statistical estimates of the output from a generator, verification is an equally powerful tool that can help to make even the weakest of designs more trustworthy. Generator designs will be reviewed in an effort to avoid common obstacles while capitalizing on a few simple and practical improvements. Testing and verification will also be considered with a focus on condensation hygrometry.

Measurement of Water Vapor in Sulphur Hexafluoride, SF6

Authors: Bob Hardy, RH Systems, Albuquerque, NM, USA | Daniel Mutter, MBW Calibration, Wettingen, Switzerland

Sulphur hexafluoride, SF6, is a non-toxic, inert, insulating and cooling gas of high dielectric strength and thermal stability. Due to its high dielectric strength, it is particularly suited for application in high power circuit breakers as well as in high-voltage cables, transformers, and switchgears. The excellent arc-quenching and insulating properties of SF6 allow the construction of new circuit breakers and switching stations of higher voltage in smaller size with less noise.

Determination of Relative Humidity in Subzero Temperatures

Author: Bob Hardy, RH Systems, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Relative Humidity of a gas is defined as the percentage ratio of the amount of water vapor present in the gas to the maximum amount of water vapor possible at that same temperature. At temperatures above freezing, water can exist in only one of two thermodynamically stable states—water vapor or a liquid. At subzero temperatures, water can exist as either a gas or a solid, but contrary to intuition, water at subzero temperature can also exist in a third thermodynamic state, liquid. This subzero, liquid state is an achievable metastable state with an energy level between that of the gas and solid. In the temperature range 0 to –40°C, this super-cooling phenomenon is quite prevalent, and Relative Humidity may be computed in either of two distinct methods, termed Standard and WMO.

Relative Humidity Uncertainty Analysis using Dew/Frost Point Measurements

Authors: Bob Hardy, RH Systems, Albuquerque, NM, USA | Daniel Mutter, MBW Calibration, Wettingen, Switzerland

Relative Humidity can be determined by the ratio of Saturation Vapor Pressure at the dew/frost point temperature to the Saturation Vapor Pressure at the air temperature. In accordance with NIST Guideline 1297, uncertainty is determined by analyzing the uncertainty of the individual components, then combining those uncertainties to obtain the total expanded uncertainty. As it applies here, we’ll analyze the uncertainties associated with the dew/frost point measurement and the air temperature measurement, then combine them to obtain the total expanded uncertainty in RH. In this analysis, we assume manufacturers stated specifications of ±0.1°C dew/frost point accuracy, and ±0.1°C air temperature measurement accuracy. If these values differ from those given for a specific instrument, then this document can be used as a guide in recomputing the uncertainty due to the stated specifications.

ITS-90 Formulations for Vapor Pressure, Frostpoint Temperature, Dewpoint Temperature, and Enhancement Factors in the Range -100 to +100 C

Author: Bob Hardy, RH Systems, Albuquerque, NM, USA

With the change in the temperature scale of ITS-90, new temperature dependent equations were required which predict saturation vapor pressure over water and ice, enhancement factor over water and ice, frostpoint temperature, and dewpoint temperature. Internationally recognized formulas based on the previous temperature scale, viewed as selfconsistent data sets for vapor pressures and enhancement factors, were chosen as initial defining equations. These formulas, coupled with those defining the temperature difference between the two scales, were used to compute new data sets consistent with the temperature scale of ITS-90. These new data sets were then fitted to equations of the original form, yielding new ITS-90 compatible coefficients to the familiar vapor pressure and enhancement factor equations. In addition, the resulting vapor pressure equations were used to produce a set of inverse approximating equations to yield frostpoint and dewpoint temperatures when the vapor pressure is known. The resulting coefficients, equations, and the conversion methods that produced them are presented.

Relative Humidity Uncertainty Analysis of the Thunder Scientific Model 2500 Two-Pressure Humidity Generator

Author: Bob Hardy, RH Systems, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Described here is the Relative Humidity Uncertainty Analysis, following NIST Guideline 1297, for a Model 2500 Humidity Generator that utilizes the NIST developed and proven two-pressure humidity generation principle. Generation of humidity in a system of this type does not require direct measurements of the water vapor content of the gas. Rather, the generated humidity is derived from the measurements of saturation and chamber pressures, and saturation and chamber temperatures.